Knuckles downed

 Uncategorized  Comments Off
Dec 042012
 

Last Friday I finished work on the penultimate draft of my new novel.  It was cause for relief as well as whiskey, since I’ve had my head down for the last several months, pushing myself to see it through to completion.  Most of the time I can both write and keep a loose hold on the rest of my life, but sometimes I just have to let go and drop into a fictional world.  That’s what I’ve been up to since the summer, and although it’s been rewarding as far as the new book is concerned, I’m sorry to have left this website in a state of disrepair.  Likewise my apologies if I’ve missed you on twitter or other places online.  My working methods aren’t brilliantly in step with the digital age.

Anyway, I’ve got some time again now.  Things to catch up on.  Things to get done.  I’ve got a new entry to add to my bestiary, which I should have up in a few days’ time.  Then there’s the imminent arrival of the UK paperback of The Man who Rained, which will be on bookshelves around the end of the month.  Meanwhile Das Mädchen mit den gläsernen Füßen (the German edition of The Girl with Glass Feet) won the lovelybooks.de award for best cover of 2012.  I can’t really claim credit for that, but it’s an excuse to show you this delightful little trailer that script5, the German publisher, put together.

 

 Posted by at 2:40 pm

Ray Bradbury

 Uncategorized  Comments Off
Jun 082012
 

Enough now. There you have it. There are one hundred stories from almost forty years of my life contained in my collected stories. They contain half the damning truths I suspected at midnight, and half of the saving truths I re-found next noon. If anything is taught here, it is simply the charting of the life of someone who started out to somewhere—and went. I have not so much thought my way through life as done things and found what it was and who I was after the doing. Each tale was a way of finding selves. Each self found each day slightly different from the one found twenty-four hours earlier.

- from Zen in the Art of Writing, by Ray Bradbury

Ray Bradbury, who died this week aged 91, has had an immeasurable impact on my writing.  Perhaps moreso than any other writer, even though I’ve read only a fraction of his enormous fictional output.  What I have read I have greatly enjoyed, but it’s his thin book of essays, Zen in the Art of Writing, for which I am most grateful.  This book, to use Bradbury’s own metaphor for writing, was a landmine.  I stepped on it when I was writing the early drafts of The Girl with Glass Feet and it blasted apart a great many false notions I’d developed about writing.  About what it meant to write, what it was for, who it was for.  Yesterday I reread it and rediscovered its many vital lessons.

A lot of books have been published with a claim on the cover that they’ll teach you how to write.  A lot of them won’t.  They’ll tangle you up with all the wrong concerns.  The vast majority of them will teach you the same old stuff about plot construction, tone, narrative voice, and so on and so on in tedious technical detail that will make you feel as if you’re building a robot, not a novel.  Don’t get me wrong, those things are important, but they’re not the starting point, they’re just aspects of final editing and technique.  Reading a hundred such books, even knowing them off by heart, will not help you develop the most fundamental part of your writing: your art.

Bradbury treated writing, unashamedly, as art.  Not art in a cerebral, critic-at-the-gallery fashion but art as the first cave painters saw it: as the first artists, trembling fitfully before the first painted bison, which seemed to them to snort and and stamp along rock walls.  Art, to Bradbury, was just such a primal thing.  An expression of something fundamental to the artist’s self.  If that seems a high-falutin’ way to talk about things, please blame me not Bradbury.  This was a man who couldn’t abide high-falutin’ of any sort.  He loved Buck Rogers just as much as he loved Gerard Manley Hopkins and, it seems to me, would not let either the dogged sci-fi fan or the theorising poetry professor tell him that the two had no place beside each other.

Zen in the Art of Writing is not a dry construction manual for building novels, but an exhortation to the would-be novelist to attune her/himself to her/his own art.  In it, Bradbury talks with infectious enthusiasm about his own experiences, specifically of where his fiction came from and how it was invoked.  It all came from inside him, of course, but it wasn’t conceptualised and planned and measured out on graph paper.  It was summoned from the shadows of the mind, those deep and hidden recesses that each of us contain and which rumble like thunder behind our thoughts while the fretting, thinking part of us forgets their existence and begins to believe that it alone is the whole self.

We are working not for work’s sake, producing not for production’s sake. If that were the case, you would be right in throwing up your hands in horror and turning away from me. What we are trying to do is find a way to release the truth that lies in all of us.

- from Zen in the Art of Writing, by Ray Bradbury

This book is a liberation for any writer.  I reread it yesterday and wished at once that I had reread it sooner.  There is much to learn from its author’s unshakeable enthusiasm for the act of creation and, if you embark upon that learning process yourself, I can assure you that it will be no sleepy school lesson on a rainy afternoon.  All the evidence suggests that Ray Bradbury lived an incredibly fulfilled life, and I for one am grateful that he chose to share his secrets.

And what, you ask, does writing teach us?

First and foremost, it reminds us that we are alive and that it is a gift and a privilege, not a right. We must earn life once it has been awarded us. Life asks for rewards back because it has favored us with animation. So while our art cannot, as we wish it could, save us from wars, privation, envy, greed, old age, or death, it can revitalize us amidst it all.

- from Zen in the Art of Writing, by Ray Bradbury

 

 

 Posted by at 2:27 pm
Mar 022012
 

On Thursday 29th March I’m going to be appearing at the Abingdon Arts Festival, at an event presented by the Abingdon Writers group.

It’s at 7.30 at Abingdon Libray, and tickets are £4.  All the info, as well as what’s on at the rest of the festival, can be found here – http://www.abingdonartsfestival.org.uk/lit.html

Hope to see you there.

 Posted by at 9:49 am

Site Redesign

 Uncategorized  Comments Off
Dec 072011
 

As you can no doubt tell if you visit here often, I’ve just given my website a lick of paint.  The only kind of web design I know is that of Doctor Frankenstein, and as such this site is more stitched together than coded.  I figure if I throw enough lightning at the thing it will eventually get up and walk, but I apologise if it leaves a mess of torn links, mauled images and hankerings for a bride in its wake.

 

More soon.  The new book is on the horizon…

 Posted by at 6:26 pm

One Day Late

 Uncategorized  Comments Off
Nov 122009
 

I’d hoped to write something about Second World War poet Keith Douglas yesterday, since it was the eleventh of November, but today will have to do instead.  Besides, I’m sure I’ll mention him on a hundred more blog posts, because he’s such an enormous inspiration.

A few times people have asked me what my influences were when writing The Girl with Glass Feet.  I’ve wanted to be cheeky and rephrase the question to ask what my inspirations are.  In my experience few writers feel any force of influence on their work.  You don’t set out to write something that’s in the style of x or the tradition of y, you just start writing.  That’s not to say that what’s been published in the past has no bearing on what’s being written in the present, its just that the things you’ve read that have motivated you to write for yourself don’t neccessarily have anything in common with your final output.

All this is a very roundabaout way of saying that Keith Douglas is my biggest literary inspiration, even if I write nothing like him.  His poems have an emotional poise that I find riveting.  Although they’re all set against the backdrop of the Second World War, they don’t deal much in politics and history, taking the enormity of their period as a given.  Instead they focus on what it’s like to be alive in such times.  Not just what it’s like to be on a battlefield, but what it’s like to sit smoking in a Jerusalem tea garden or lose a lover because of the distance between one country and another.

I feel very lucky to be able to read Douglas’ work at all.  He was an unknown poet when he was killed and buried under a hedge in France in 1944.  He’d had bits and pieces published here and there and had received rejection slips from, among others, T S Eliot, but his early death (aged 24) meant he had left too seemingly small a body of work to be remembered.  So he slipped into obscurity and remained there for many years until Ted Hughes – thank goodness – began to champion him and throw his weight behind the republication of his poems.

This potted history is apt, because Douglas doesn’t seem to fit in among his contemporaries.  To me his work feels less tied to tradition (or to the idea of having to break with tradition).  His poems take the form he needs them to take, with a disregard for the literary fashions of his time.  That’s not to say they were wildly experimental, just that he was enormously comfortable in his medium (he even wrote a poem about this, straightforwardly called Words, which sums up neatly his approach to writing). 

I first came across Keith Douglas when I was about the same age he would have been as he wrote his best poems.  I was looking for a way to understand what I was trying to achieve with my own writing, trying to figure out what form it should take.  Reading Douglas’ perfectly-formed works just seemed to make things click into place.  Suddenly I knew how I wanted to write.  Obviously I wouldn’t be writing Second World War poetry, but I wanted to make something that was expressive in the way that his poems were.  I’m still trying to figure out precisely how to do that, which has led to an even greater admiration for Douglas.  He was so young when he wrote these things and it’s such a tragedy that he never got to write more.

If you buy his poetry book (of which there will only ever be one), don’t start at the beginning, because the poems are arranged chronologically and at the beginning is all the stuff he wrote as a schoolboy.  I suspect this is included for two reasons.  Firstly, there aren’t enough complete adult poems to fill a book and secondly, it’s interesting to see his literary development.  You can come back to all this later.  Start, instead, at the end and read backwards.  The very last poem in the book, On A Return From Egypt, is my favourite, and the only bit of writing I’ve ever memorised.

I wish I could reproduce some of his work for you here, but the copyright is a bit uncertain, I’m afraid.  The internet seems like a brilliant tool through which publishers could promote their poetry lists, but I doubt that’s going to happen any time soon.  All I can suggest is that you go to the D shelf of your bookshop’s poetry section and find this little grey book.  Try reading Time Eating and On A Return From Egypt, which I hope you will enjoy as much as I do.

 Posted by at 12:41 pm
Oct 092009
 

Edgar Allan Poe is having his second funeral this Sunday.  I’ve just posted about it on my Litro blog, but it’s such a splendidly odd thing that I wanted to bring it to your attention here too.  I’ve posted a few related links over at Litro, but type “Poe Funeral” into Google and you’ll find all manner of oddities. 

Weird.

 Posted by at 7:07 pm
Sep 222009
 

This is a bit of an excuse to tell you about what I did on my holidays, but I couldn’t resist showing you some pictures of the library in the woods at End Of The Road.  It’s just such a great idea, these bookshelves affixed to trees in decorated woodland.  They had the bad Victorian version of Scrapefoot there, but they also had the complete works of Emerson, which seemed very appropriate (if only there had been the time to read it).

     

There were no librarians at the library in the woods, although perhaps they were hiding behind the trees.  I wonder what they would have looked like.  For a while, though, Keira Rathbone typed away in a corner of the glade.  She uses a typewriter to draw her pictures.  As a writer who loves his imagery, I find that really exciting.  I try to make pictures with typed words, but she takes it one step further and literally uses type to create images.

   

I’m still trying to draw nixies.  A nixie is a water beast, but is she part-fish or part-frog?  An old art teacher of mine used to tell me I was only any good at drawing monsters, which hurt at the time since I thought I was being an expressionist.  Now I tend to agree with her.  Soon I hope to have a whole shoal of monstrous nixies drawn for you, and we can talk about the wonderful little story in which they belong.

 Posted by at 7:57 pm
Sep 102009
 

I went to see District 9 last night and can’t really rate it highly enough.  It’s like a sci-fi version of Kafka’s The Metamorphosis, and it’s gripping from start to finish.  The only downside is how impactful it is.  I dreamed all night of my feet turning into slime and insect claws, which now I think about it reminds me of something…

I have been busy throwing myself at the new story I’m writing, which is proving so incredibly difficult to finish that I’ve not kept up much this week with online goings on.  There was a kind review in Publishers Weekly over in the States on Monday.  The Girl with Glass Feet is out there in January, published by Henry Holt.  Thank you, also, to those good folk who have reviewed it on their blogs or written to tell me they’d read it.  It’s greatly appreciated, I promise you.

I’m off to the End Of The Road festival tomorrow, back in the good green shire of Dorset.  They have a library in the woods there (bookshelves on the trees, that kind of thing), which I’m looking forward to exploring.  I’m hoping I’ll find a gem to read .  Then, next week, I hope to post about another fairy story - The Nixie in the Mill Pond, which is a spooky little love story of the highest order.

So, until then…

 Posted by at 10:28 am

Roald Dahl

 Uncategorized  Comments Off
Sep 042009
 

I was just getting excited about Roald Dahl over at my litro blog, and came across this, which is really good fun.  Listen to it when you’re tucked up in bed and the wind is howling outside.

 Posted by at 7:02 pm
Sep 032009
 

For some reason, my post about Hans-My-Hedgehog has this week attracted some three hundred spam comments, which I have been deleting by the bucketload.  It’s led me to write a big long list of no-go keywords that this blog will look for in a comment and cage in a kind of virtual quarantine.  That list is officially the filthiest thing I’ve ever written (maybe the filthiest thing I’ve ever read), and has taken so much time composing I’m a bit off the pace for the next fairy story post.  All the same there were a few interesting pieces among the countless adverts for online pharmacies. 

If somehow you have the good fortune not to have to look at this stuff daily, it’s all composed randomly by computers, a kind of crass Dada about investment opportunities and the latest fertility drugs.  Most of it consists of lists the spamming software cobbles together, but once in a while you get a piece that grabs several sections of text from articles across the internet, mashes them together, and sticks them on your blog.  Amongst these posts you get the odd rare gem, where things have gone full circle and turned into a kind of literary collage.  My favourite ever piece was something I received when I worked in Blackwells.  I wish I’d saved it: it was a mash-up of The Lord of the Rings and The Song of Songs.  Gandalf telling Frodo what a fine fellow he was, mixed up with ancient Hebrew love poetry.

This piece, then, isn’t quite as amazing, but I was pleased that it had accidentally matched itself to a post about a Brothers Grimm story.  It’s drawn mostly on an article about children’s literature (there was some debate in the press this week about whether kids’ books are getting too gritty) and mixed it up with a dash of self-help and some end-of-the-world stuff.  I think it actually has something to say about fairy stories.  Enjoy…

In the seventh heaven endings make for more reading.
The rose-tinted on cloud nine of Blyton is often criticised and I tip my primordial headmistress being darned sniffy near the Illustrious Five novels and Malory Towers, but I credit this framer with my own lifelong passion in return books. There are currently six on my bedside table and another on my desk waiting to be read.
At the age of 10 I wouldn’t partake of wanted to impute to less distressed children growing up unloved in single-parent families or stories about drugs or the death of someone close. There’s occasion satisfactorily destined for gritty realism in later life. Children shouldn’t have planned to confront up to the legitimate elated too near the start in their lives. A handful magical fairy tales or heartwarming fleshly stories do them no hurt at all and equanimous in a brand-new storybook station in an urban aspect there’s area an eye to the main character to overcome the odds, status quo the endearing ideal, clear up the mystery, be the victor in the preparation or coextensive with abolished to the ball.

 Posted by at 4:03 pm