Dec 072012
 

January 1st 1909.  Ten-Footed Bear.  Tarak told us Wednesday evening that the tenfooted bear lives mostly in the water like a seal.  Looks like a polar bear all but the ten legs.  When he walks on ice the five feet of each side track after each other so the bear makes a double track like a sled.  Walking the bear often gets his legs tangled up; there are so many, he can’t manage them all.  Once a man was followed by a ten-footed bear.  The man walked between two cakes of ice and the bear was caught in the crevice between them.  If his feet had not become entangled he might have gotten off.  As it was, the man speared him.  When dying, the bear fell on his back, all his feet pawing the air.  This is an old men’s story.  Tarak never saw such a bear or tracks.

- Vilhjalmur Stefansson, in his Stefansson-Anderson expedition journal, 1908-1912

One of the wonderful things about monsters is that you can make them even more monstrous by merging them together.  Many fabulous beasts are a fusion of animal body parts, or of multiple instances of the same creature crammed together: one body with three heads or nine tails.  So too the qupqugiaq of the Arctic, who the Inuit and Inupiat peoples describe as a massive polar bear with ten legs.  During blizzards, the qupqugiaq rolls onto its back and waves all its limbs in the air.  Fooled by the swirling snow, the unwary hunter mistakes the moving legs for a human crowd and goes to them.  Then the qupqugiaq tears him into more than ten pieces, and feasts well.

We don’t know much more than that about qupqugiaqs (most of those who survive an encounter only do so by killing the bear), although it would be wrong to think of them as malignant creatures just because they like to snack on human beings.  That’s just bears being bears.  Evidently the ten-legged polar bear can be an aid as well as a danger.  In Explorations in Anthropology and Theology, by Frank A. Salamone and Walter R. Adams, the authors’ Inupiat host describes how his son inherited a ten-legged bear as an animal helper (a feral kind of guardian angel) from an ancestor.  ‘Polar bear helpers grow to a gigantic size,’ he explains, ‘then develop three more pairs of legs to become the ten-legged polar bears known as kiniq or qoqoqiaq.’

There’s another kind of many-legged and nigh-on mythic bear out there, officialy named the tardigrade but more commonly referred to as the water bear.  At less than a millimetre in size, it’s obviously not a member of the ursidae family of mammals.  But, hey, those extra limbs also bar the ten-legged polar bear from entry into the mammalian club, so I’m calling both of these creatures as members of familus qupqugiaq.  To make up for their size, water bears have powers.  They can ressurect themselves, for a start, and they can become invulnerable when the need arises.  In September 2007, two water bears blasted off in a rocket from Kazakhstan.  In orbit around the Earth, they endured the airlessness and vastness of space as well as the lethal radiation of unfiltered sunlight.  Then, after ten days, they returned from their mission alive and well.  Here’s water bear expert Mike Shaw (no relation), outlining some of the amazing properties of these animals.

 

 

I can think of one reason why those water bears survived: there are already bears in space, and these star bears took a shining (forgive me) to them.  Ovid describes how Juno transformed Callisto and her son Arcas into bears, only for Jupiter to throw them into space.  You can listen to Ted Hughes read his translation of that sequence at the National Gallery’s website, and you really, really ought to.  ‘Then to empty her cries of their appeal / The goddess nipped off her speech.  Instead of words / A shattering snarl burst from her throat, a threat – / Callisto was a bear.’

That story describes how the stars of Ursa Major came into being.  Likewise the Iroquois tell a story of the same constellation bear.  Three hunters chase the animal so high that they end up in the heavens.  ‘As it broke from the cover of the pines, the four hunters saw it, a gigantic white shape, so pale as to appear almost naked.  With loud hunting cries, they began to run after it.  The great bear’s strides were long and it ran more swiftly than a deer.’  In outer space, they spear the bear, cook it and eat it.  Then, to their amazement, it comes back to life.  Like the water bear, it can withstand just about anything.

According to Wikipedia, ‘The pre-Christian Finns believed the bear to have come from the stars and that it had the ability to reincarnate.’  A chap called Matti Sarmela has written a fascinating and extensive study called The Bear in the Finnish Environment, where he notes that, ‘Narratives of the bear de­scended or evicted from heaven are also found with Siberian hunting peoples. One of the closest equivalents of the Finnish bear birth poem is the Khanty myth narrative. In the beginning of time, the bear lived in the heavens. Defying the orders of the master of heaven or supreme god To’rom, it wanted to take a peek at earth and was enchanted by the land of the Khanty. By defying the order, the bear committed a “deadly sin” and as punishment, the supreme god ordered that it should be lowered in a cradle by golden chains onto earth.’

If interstellar cousins aren‘t behind the water bears’ miraculous antics, perhaps they’re due to all those legs.  Perhaps many-legged bears are just plain magic.  Further evidence comes in the form of one more nearly-bear, the woolly bear caterpillar.  This is another diminutive species of qupqugiaq that likes to come back from the dead.  It’s also my chance to once again shoehorn into this bestiary the work of the peerless David Attenborough.  He, as far as I’m concerned, is the closest thing we have on Earth to a mighty bear spirit…

 

 Posted by at 12:35 pm

Noppera-bo

 Figments: A Bestiary  Comments Off
Feb 092012
 

She appeared to be a slight and graceful person, handsomely dressed; and her hair was arranged like that of a young girl of good family.  ‘O-jochu,’ he exclaimed, approaching her, ‘O-jochu, do not cry like that! … Tell me what the trouble is; and if there be any way to help you I shall be glad to help you.’  (He really meant what he said; for he was a very kind man.)  But she continued to weep – hiding her face from him with one of her long sleeves … Then that O-jochu turned around, and dropped her sleeve, and stroked her face with her hand – and the man saw that she had no eyes or nose or mouth.’

- from Mujina by Lafcadio Hearn

The only interesting thing about a monster is its humanity.  When, in the back of a book of a thousand imaginary beings, I came upon a Japanese print labelled Noppera-bo, I was at once struck by its sense of sadness.  It seemed like it carried a weight too heavy for a creature so small and shapeless.  This noppera-bo was a strange, sagging creature with an arrangement of wrinkles in place of a face.  I started reading what I could about it: that it was a ghost found weeping or in great distress.  When comforted, it would turn to face the comforter then wipe a hand across its face.  With that motion its features would smudge away: eyes, nose and lips smoothing out into a face as plain as eggshell.

I loved this story but it didn’t seem to fit the wrinkled fellow in my print.  Turns out that little guy is a nuppeppo, a different kind of ghost entirely, whom the compilers of my book had confused with the noppera-bo.  There’s not a lot to be said about the nuppeppo, except that he smells of fetid meat and to eat him grants immortality.  But I don’t think the world needs the sort of people who’d cook nuppeppos to live forever.

But what of the noppera-bo?  Facelessness is a powerful idea.  We’re hard-wired to hone in on human faces and pick them out in the most unlikely of places.  There was a spot in 2011′s Royal Institute Christmas lectures in which Bruce Hood showed an eleven week old baby one abstract pattern and one pattern that resembled a human face.  Immediately the baby attuned himself to the face (you can watch it here – fascinating from start to finish but the bit I mentioned starts at 7.20).  Likewise we often imagine faces in clouds, bark or the burned surfaces of our toast.  Since we’re so hyper-sensitive to the pattern of a human face, it follows that we’re  unnerved on some deep-seated level if we focus on the place where a face should be and find it wiped away – find nothing there at all.

When I was a kid, my art hero was Francis Bacon.  My noppera-bo pastel drawings at the top of this post are basically a rip-off of his style.  Throughout his career, Bacon obscured, smudged and obliterated the faces of his subjects.  In his Man in Blue series he painted anonymous businessmen whose eroded features contrasted unnervingly with the crisp precision of their suits.  I think of them each in one of two ways, either as down-trodden workers with their identities sapped away, or as terrifying bureaucrats whose humanity has melted from them along with their faces.  Therein lies the paradox of facelessness.  When we use the word in general parlance we either talk about string-pulling elites in shadowy boardrooms or the voiceless masses forced into anonymity by poverty or oppressive systems.  Certain sections of our society become vocally perturbed by balaclavas, hoodies, burqas, and so on, because they all prompt our gut fear of facelessness, of noppera-bos.  But of course the weirdly beautiful thing about being human is that we’re often at our best when we act in contradiction of our animal impulses.  When the noppera-bo is come upon weeping, are its tears really a trick to lure the unwary, or are they the genuine despair of a person made faceless in the powerless sense?

 

Just as we can be unnerved by facelessness, we can be moved by it.  If the men and women who this old B-movie takes for its inspiration evoke any kind of horror it’s the horror of their fate.  The plaster casts of Mount Vesuvius’ incinerated victims still speak their horror, some one thousand nine hundred and thirty three years since their mummification in ash.  Their faces are barely more detailed than that of the noppera-bo.  Anonymous victims, but it takes only an inflexion in plaster for them to haunt us still.

In Hayao Miyazaki’s 2001 maserpiece Spirited Away, a girl becomes lost in a world of monsters, many of them faceless or masked.  She’s imprisoned in a bewitched bath-house by a sorceress who steals her name.  But our heroine, Chihiro, learns much about herself by having her identity stripped from her.  One of the ghosts in the film is called No-Face, a shapeless figure of black wearing an egg-shell smooth mask.  No-Face is introduced as a frightening monster, munching on the hotel staff, but come the latter stages of the film it has befriended Chihiro and become a lonely, reflective figure.

Spirited Away is all about stolen identities.  Until she recaptures her name from the sorceress, Chihiro cannot know who she was before coming to the bath-house.  She’s in a nightmarish predicament, but here’s the catch.  It’s through losing her identity that she learns about herself.  Perhaps facelessness can mean a liberation?

 

As well as being hard-wired to fear facelessness, we’re also equipped with astonishing powers of face recognition and empathy.  Our instinctive empathy enables us to feel some part of what another person’s face is expressing, even if that face is incomplete or only partially human.  Hence our ability to cry at cartoon lions or sympathise with the plaster-cast victims of Vesuvius.  This next is conjecture, but I suspect a similar part of our brain is active when presented with a story.  We can empathise with the mental images created with words.  We can empathise with a wordless human song or cry.

Wiped-blank faces encourage us to reach elsewhere with our empathy.  T0 the right is one of Henri Matisse’s occasional faceless figures, Nude, Spanish Carpet.  It hardly evokes the dread of Francis Bacon’s tortured souls.  And below are some of John Stezaker’s amazing collages of old photos mashed with landscapes, from his series Masks.  Here facelessness is striking, but it doesn’t terrify.  For my part it makes me think of worlds within, deep rich realms waiting to be explored.

Characters in fairy stories very rarely have their histories fleshed out.  Often they are attributed with only the most basic of personalities and described in the broadest terms possible (they might not even get as far as being ‘beautiful’ or ‘ugly’ or ‘golden-locked’).  Names, too, are not regularly used, unless they’re the same name over and over like Hans or Jack.  Instead of being asked to view such characters as distinct from ourselves, we’re encouraged to see them as everymen, almost as a kind of bait for our empathy to leap on.  I’m sure we’ve all speculated, at some point in our lives, about what it would be like to disappear completely and reinvent ourselves in some far-flung corner of the world, but in stories we are doing this all of the time.  And in the moments of transition, when we are becoming ‘lost’ in a good book or film, perhaps we are noppera-bos, wiping off our regular faces in order to experience life behind another.

 Posted by at 4:58 pm

Panotii

 Figments: A Bestiary  Comments Off
Sep 272011
 

Panotii

She is one of the Panotii.  She has ears so big that she can hear evil.  Sometimes she goes out with no clothes on, because her ears are big enough to wrap around her and keep her warm.

She lives on an island along with the other Panotii.  Noted cataloguer of made-up beings, Pliny the Elder, wrote that this place, this All-Ears Island, lay somewhere within landlocked Asia.  Another ancient geographer, Pomponius Mela, thought it was one of the Orkney Isles.  Thankfully, the mapmakers of the Hereford Mappa Mundi, a 700-year-old map inked onto vellum, cleared up the matter.  Their Mappa Mundi is a fabulous work, as attested to here

What the BBC video doesn’t show is a little island in the top left of the map.  Squint at this and you’ll see it…

Hereford_Mappa_Mundi

…but in case you couldn’t make it out, here’s a close-up.

Phanedii

That’s All-Ears Island, and let me give you its geographical context in the world as we know it.  The furthest north point on this map is India, and the British Isles are in the bottom left, at about eight o’clock.  That circle in the centre of the map is Jerusalem.  Midway between Jerusalem and ten o’clock is Noah’s Ark, while Gog and Magog are closer to eleven.  By now you should have a pretty clear idea of where All-Ears Island exists.

~

Time for a big-eared interlude, because it’s cute to do so.

~

Sebastian Brant's Panotii

Sebastian Brant wrote about the Panotti in his edition of Aesop’s Fables (that’s his woodcut, above, from page 372), while they also appear in the Nuremberg Chronicle (below) and in the bottom right corner of this elaborate stone relief from the Basilique Sainte-Marie-Madeleine in France.

642px-Schedel'sche_Weltchronik-Large_ears

The British Library has another fabulous image on its site, into which you can zoom and zoom until you can see the brush marks in the ink

011COTTIBB00005U00083V00[SVC2]

I like the way this Panotii has rolled up its ears to either eschew decency or catch some sun.  The BL’s accompanying article states that the Panotii can even escape from danger by flapping their ears and flying away.  Which reminds me of this…

 Posted by at 3:14 pm

Figments

 Figments: A Bestiary  Comments Off
Jul 222011
 

One of my all-time favourite books is Jorge Luis Borges’ The Book of Imaginary Beings.  I’ve talked before about my love of bestiaries, and this one is perhaps the finest ever compiled.  It takes a scattered, all-inclusive approach to the creatures it describes, with Borges hopping about from anecdote to anecdote and placing ‘classical’ beasts alongside those imagined by some of his favourite contemporary authors.  I’m building a little collection of bestiaries, at the head of which it proudly sits.

For a while now I’ve wanted to start blogging about made-up animals and unique creatures – monsters, for lack of a better word.  I use “monster” hesitantly, because I think monsters are in a bad place at the moment.  The monsters we tend to see on the cinema screen, for example, are like beaten-down circus animals made to perform in ways that demean them.  These monsters are rationalised to the point of familiarity.  They are made into species, so that they can be ridden, tamed, fed, patted on the head…

That’s fine, of course, it serves a storytelling and spectacle-inducing purpose, but real monsters don’t make sense like that.  They should be impossible by definition, and therefore wondrous or terrifying or both.  So I’m going to start trying to share some of my favourites with you, as a kind of tribute to The Book of Imaginary Beings and its ilk.  Because this is a blog, I hope to be able to pull together various quotes, pictures and videos from across the web.  I’ll also be attempting to illustrate each entry myself.

When I’ve done a few more I’ll collect them on a dedicated web page, but for the time being they’ll be categorised under “Figments” here, with the first three entries appearing below.  I hope you enjoy them.

 Posted by at 4:40 pm

Reprobus

 Figments: A Bestiary  Comments Off
Jul 222011
 

Reprobus

Medieval Europeans believed in many strange peoples inhabiting the uncharted lands beyond the edges of their maps.  The medieval conception of the world would have been of a charted haven surrounded by boundless strangeness.  Living in the far distance were all manner of wonderful civilizations: the one-legged people, the people whose faces looked out of their chests, and the people with the heads of dogs.

Illustration from Sebastian Münster's Cosmographia

It’s impossible to be sure of how these stories originated.  No doubt they’re due in part to a fear of the unknown, to medieval man’s sense that Christendom was an island in a sea of heathens and demons.  More charitably, it’s possible that explorers simply made up such peoples, knowing full well that their audiences at home would never be able to disprove their claims.  Such explorers would have known, too, that often a little bit of fiction makes life more fascinating.  There’s also a theory that travellers mistook certain animals for men.  In the case of the dog-heads, it’s possible that explorers saw baboons or lemurs and thought they were types of human being.  At Wild Film History you can watch David Attenborough talk about the indri…

Wild Film History

Wherever he came from, and regardless of whether or not he was actually a lemur, Reprobus was a dog-headed man who converted to Christianity and found his way to the city of Antioch.  Upon his conversion he took the name Christopher (now St. Christopher), but swiftly ran into trouble with the dastardly Emperor Decius and his henchman Baceus.

There came a certain Baceus to him and struck him. “You may do so”, said Christopher, “for I will not strike you in return, but I forgive you, for forgiveness is the new law.” 3. Baceus went to the king, and said: “Hail O King, I have news for you. I have seen a man with a dog’s head on him, and long hair, and eyes glittering like the morning star in his head, and his teeth were like the tusks of a wild boar. I struck him for he was cursing the gods; but he did not strike me, and said it was for the sake of God that he refrained.

- from the Irish Passion of St. Christopher, presented by David Woods of University College Cork on his website

Byzantine St ChristopherAfter this episode, Decius summons Reprobus and tries to force him to sacrifice to the gods of the city.  When Reprobus refuses, Decius employs hooks, burning lamps and – most feared of all by the church at the time – pretty women, to try to break his resolve.  Although Reprobus never made the sacrifice, by the end of the story he has had enough of turning the other cheek.  Decius is worn out too, and has Reprobus beheaded, but not before the saint invokes an angel to, ‘give to Decius a devil to compel him to gnaw his own flesh and so die.’  And so, nobody lives happily ever after.

A disclaimer – this is not the version of St. Christopher’s story that most present-day Catholics would recognise.  At some point in history, the legends surrounding Christopher and those of the dog-headed people became entangled.  Since then the two have been separated, and  Reprobus cut loose as an unwanted anomaly of religious history.  Perhaps it is fitting, after all.  The name Reprobus translates as Outcast.

 Posted by at 4:39 pm
Jul 222011
 

Muirgheis

Lady Gregory, she of W B Yeats fame, recorded the following passage in her book on Irish folklore (you can read an online version of it here).

…and Eochaid was drowned with his children; and the water spread out into a great lake that has the name of Loch Neach to this day. But Liban that was one of Eochaid’s daughters was not drowned, but she was in her sunny-house under the lake and her little dog with her for a full year, and God protected her from the waters. And one day she said “O Lord, it would be well to be in the shape of a salmon, to be going through the sea the way they do.” Then the one half of her took the shape of a salmon and the other half kept the shape of a woman; and she went swimming the sea, and her little dog following her in the shape of an otter and never leaving her or parting from her at all.

- from A Book of Saints and Wonders by Lady Gregory

This is reminiscent of a Catalan fairy story, The Girl-Fish, recorded by Andrew Lang, in which a girl is transformed into a salmon.  Of course there are countless folk stories about people who go to live in the sea, or about mermaids and mermen, supposed by some to have originated from sailors’ sightings of mammals with fish-like characteristics, such as the sea cow.

Then she told him all her story, and how it was under the round hulls of ships she had her dwelling-place, and the waves were the roofing of her house, and the strands its walls. “And it is what I am come for now” she said “to tell you that I will come to meet you on this day twelve-month at Inver Ollorba; and do not fail to meet me there for the sake of all the saints of Dalaradia.” And at the year’s end the nets were spread along the coast where she said she would come, and it was in the net of Fergus from Miluic she was taken. And the clerks gave her her choice either to be baptized and go then and there to heaven, or to stay living through another three hundred years and at the end of that time to go to heaven; and the choice she made was to die. Then Comgall baptized her and the name he gave her was Muirgheis, the Birth of the Sea. So she died, and the messengers that came and that carried her to her burying place, were horned deer that were sent by the angels of God.

- from A Book of Saints and Wonders by Lady Gregory

Jenny HaniverThere are various sites in the British Isles where mermaids and other sea maidens were supposedly brought ashore and baptised/buried.  Although it sounds incredulous, in the sixteenth century there were in fact a fair few mermaid corpses in circulation.  Those same sailors who’d fantasised about manatees were still inventing monsters when they reached the shore.  Sailors would carve and varnish the bodies of dried skates and rays to create freakish figures known colloquially as Jenny Hanivers (read a good Time Magazine article about it here).  These could be presented to superstitious landlubbers as the bodies of sea saints and girls of the deep.  The rewards could come in the form of hard cash, or simply the fun of a well-executed practical joke.

 Posted by at 4:38 pm
Jul 222011
 

Vegetable Lamb of Tartary

For in his path he sees a monstrous birth,
The Borametz arises from the earth
Upon a stalk is fixed a living brute,
A rooted plant bears quadruped for fruit,
…It is an animal that sleeps by day
And wakes at night, though rooted in the ground,
To feed on grass within its reach around.

- Dr. De la Croix, in Connubia Florum, Latino Carmine Demonstrata (1791)

This plant bears a crop of cute little lambs.  It is therefore the go-to fruit tree for hungry wolves.  Sadly, in order to survive, the lambs need to remain attached to the umbilical stems of the plant and this means that, once they have nibbled away all the grass within reach, they starve to death.  It’s an unfortunate and fleeting existence, belonging to one of the most absurd creatures ever invented.

The Vegetable Lamb’s Wikipedia entry suggests that the Golden Chicken Fern may have provided the basis for the Barometz, but I expect that this one is just too far-fetched to have any grounding in reality.

In the splendid book Beasts! Kaela Graham contributed a fantastic illustration of the Barometz.  Also check out his unpublished version.

Barometz by Kaela Graham

If you haven’t got Beasts! or Beasts! Book Two, I’d highly recommend that you rectify the situation.  They’re collections of, well, beasts, as depicted by various comic book artists and collected by Jacob Covey for Fantagraphics.  Each picture comes at its subject from a fresh angle, and nothing is depicted in the way you might expect (the mermaid in the second volume springs to mind).

Jorge Luis Borges included the Barometz in his Book of Imaginary Beings, where he referenced other plants that behave like animals, namely a bird-eating plant imagined by G K Chesterton, the trees in Dante’s forest of self-murderers, and the crying mandrake, as recently seen in Guillermo Del Toro’s masterpiece, Pan’s Labyrinth (here shown relaxing between takes).

In the ocean there is a creature that really is a plant-animal hybrid.  Whereas leaf insects, stick insects, and these fern-like creatures found in the Antarctic merely look like plants, the Green Sea Slug has performed the trick of the Barometz in reverse, and become part-vegetable.

 Posted by at 4:37 pm